Comscore Struggles to Stay Relevant
Friday, January 25th, 2008A week or two ago in the Washington Post there was an article by Josh Chasin, the Chief Research Officer of comScore. The article was describing the challenges faced by marketers in measuring consumers’ consumption of the Internet, and more importantly, Internet advertising.
The article lists the usual suspects as threats to online ad measurement: Ajax, multitasking, rich media, etc. and says that comScore is working on better ways to measure user “engagement” with online advertising.
What it doesn’t list is the threat to comScore’s business model posed by the backlash from websites who say that comScore and Nielsen (the other major online advertising measurement service) do a terrible job of measuring even such basic things as online visitors and pageviews, much less such esoteric things as “engagement.”
As described a little in Mr. Chasin’s column, comScore is moving toward engagement metrics and away from basic metrics such as pageviews and unique visitors. Without actually being an engineer at comScore, it seems that this will rely on extrapolating the online web surfing behavior of a few users to the entire Internet audience, in a similar way to how Nielsen measures TV and Arbitron measures radio.
This begs the question – why? Isn’t the advantage of online advertising that every single action and interaction can be measured? Why then take a new technology that improves greatly on the old ways of doing things and try to shoe-horn it back into the old methods of measurement?
Someday soon, some startup in New York or Silicon Valley is going to figure out an accurate way to measure all web users’ interaction with web content and advertising without violating their privacy. When they do, the existing players are doomed.